Welcome to Rod Senter's...

CUT to the CHASE!

The new conservative blog that dares to lay it on the line!



Today's political landscape can be a scarey place. But to reach an even SCARIER place, click on he link below!

http://www.webspawner.com/users/frightfactor/




You WON'T be disappointed!



Are you one of America's 40+ million law-abiding gun owners? Do you want to keep President Hillary from taking them all away? Then visit this website and join the...

National Rifle Association!

http://www.nra.org/


FINALLY...a Conservative who can stand up to Hillary Clinton and her Socialist agenda (curses! where's Joe McCarthy when you need him?):

http://www.johnmccain.com/

JOHN McCAIN for PRESIDENT!



If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed


Sunday, July 22, 2007
DUH! Some Things Aren't SUPPOSED to Go Smoothly

DUH! Some Things Aren't Supposed to Go Smoothly

(The following is a reprint of Rod Senter's editorial reply to the NewYork Times story, "The Nuremberg Hangings --- Not So Smooth Either" by Tom Zeller [Jan 17, 2007]) 

Arch-Liberals who recoil at the suggestion of capital punishment have only themselves to blame for the cesspool of malignant crime to which our country has descended. When we actually punished criminals instead of coddling them and obsessing over their self-esteem, it seems that there were fewer of them in our midst. 

      So let's Cut To The Chase:

      Is capital punishment really a significant deterrent to violent crime? Don't know and don't care. Murderers* should be hanged by the neck until dead...

     a) because they deserve it, and,
     b) because most who are sentenced to anything less will be out of jail in a handful of years to commit simlar atrocities to innocent people again.

     Now, about hanging in particular: does it really snap the neck, sending the hangee peacefully into lah-lah land as if having fallen asleep watching Jay Leno --- except with a rope around his neck? Gee, I would so hate to think that were true.

     Any gallows of my design would have a 1 inch-thick rope placed about the condemned's neck, with the noose positioned --- now listen closely, sportsfans --- smack-dab in the back of his neck, not on the left side as was done with Saddam Hussein. And instead of seven or eight feet of slack in the rope, the poor slob on my gallows would get no more than two feet --- ­two-and-a-half if he's lucky.

     When the trap door opens, the condemned would plunge a maximum of 24 to 30 inches (not a ridiculous 8 feet) before the rope becomes taught and actually suspends him by his neck. That being done, the rest of us can just sit back, pop open a cold one, and watch the show.

    What is this you say, flaming Liberals? That this is inumane? Well...DUH! Last I heard, that was the general idea. Humanity is for decent people who work hard and contribute as best they can to the fabric of civilized society, not scumbuckets who measure the quality of their lives by the extent to which can decimate the lives of others.

     As someone else in this forum pointed out, the ten Nazis at Nuremberg did not die  quickly --- unless you consider the better part of half an hour quick. But to make the scene even more entertaining (for us at least), consider the obvious fact that one of them had to hang first, then second, and so on. Now think for a moment about the last one to be taken:  for something like two hours, he would have suffered the mind-numbing agony of listening to nine of his former comrads plunge through the trap door and slowly strangulate to death, before the hangman's guards finally came for him.  Of course, a couple of minutes and a flight of stairs later, he would find out what agony really is. 

     On a slightly more personal note, I'd give a year's pay to have seen the look on his face as he was dragged up the gallows stairs to dance for the hangman himself.

     Did you notice that the word murderers, above, had an asterisk (*) next to it? This is because while Ted Bundy-types should be at the front of the line to the nearest working scaffold, by no means should they enjoy exlusive membership. Being an "equal opportunity" kind of guy, I would also admit rapists, dope-dealers, perpetrators of any crimes involving firearms, and I'd make danged sure there was plenty of room for  more. A lot more --- 'cause frankly, we have a lot of catching up to do.

     The stark truth is that there is nothing wrong with our criminal justice system that a trap door and a good strong rope wouldn't cure. And it would help to create --- or should I say, bring back --- safer streets and neighborhoods for the rest of us.

     Sadly, our country's powerful but brain-dead  Liberals don't see it that way. And many an innocent person has suffered --- often unto violent and unprovoked death --- because of it. Even worse,  many more will follow,  largely because of them.

     So let's hear it for the self-righteous,  hipper-than-thou, deranged-to-the-core Liberals:  

    Hip hip...go 'way! 

Rod Senter
http://cuttothechase.blogdrive.com/

 


Posted at 06:24 pm by rodsenter
Make a comment  

Thursday, May 03, 2007
A Liberal Dose of Conservative Ire

A Liberal Dose of Conservative Ire 

 

 

Okay, the world is up to its eyeballs in blogs. Touché, I concede the point with an open heart.  So what makes mine better than the rest? While I'm not going to say that  mine is better  --- that kind of arrogance is best left to Liberals --- but a claim of being different from most might actually have some merit. 

 

            So let's Cut to the Chase:

 

             Is it just me, or has a hidden far-left agenda seeped into the roots of nearly everything we see nowadays?

 

            As if I had to say it, arch-Liberalism has long ago bound and gagged the movie and television industries, as well as most of their actors and writers.  The film Lethal Weapon 4 comes to mind, having taken one cheap shot after another at the National Rifle Association and gun rights in general, while the stars Gibson & Glover blasted much of the surrounding state to Kingdom Come, mostly with----you guessed it --- guns. Not that Liberal rhetoric and bald-faced hypocrisy are strange bedfellows by any means, nor is "LW-4" an  isolated example --- but once in awhile a particular example really takes the cake. Or in this case, more like the whole darn bakery!

 

            I'm also reminded of actress Sharon Stone, who after the Columbine shootings made quite a production out of surrendering a boxed handgun to authorities while proclaiming, "I'm giving up my right to Keep and Bear Arms." Oh, puh-leeeeeaaase!  While it's unclear if this shameless exploitation of a then-recent tragedy actually bolstered her career,  I can tell you this: after that (publicity) stunt, a team of wild stallions couldn't drag me toward any DVD that Ms. Stone even handled, let alone stars in. Besides, do you believe she ever actually owned a firearm in her name?  Neither do I.

 

            Not to be outdone by the entertainment realm, college academia has for some years been tumbling down a perilous slope toward self-indulgent lunacy, with useful education being secondary if it's still considered at all.

 

            There...I've said it. If you don't like it, log onto ebay and buy yourself a another fake Tiffany lampshade; maybe it will distract you for awhile. Here...I'll even give you their link:

 

ebay

 

            But there's some truth to my statement just the same. Although I'm sure there are exceptions, many a college kid's only discernible talent is the ability to ingest Liberal ideologies and projectile-vomit them at weary  bystanders faster than Wyatt Earp could sling his trusty Remington...or Colt...well, whatever the hell he actually carried.

 

            As the manager of a retail specialty store for more than a decade, I've had the mind-numbing experience of employing some of these wing-nuts who were attending, or had recently graduated from, local colleges. With only slight variation, most were pretty much the same: 

 

            They could spew Liberal politics 'till they're blue in the face but couldn't count change. They could bend your ear six-ways-to-Sunday about organic food, social injustice or that the moon landings were staged on a New York alfalfa farm; but when it came to work ethics and viable skills, they were virtually clueless. And as salespeople? --- honestly, a box of rocks could have done just as well. Maybe even a little better, and with a lot less back-talk.

 

            In a nutshell, most of them could be described as intellectual and articulate, but functionally useless. Moreover, they were consumed by a kind of stand off-ish demeanor bordering on outright smugness, which their actual performance rarely  lived up to. I can only assume they learned this in college. Trust me, it isn't helping.

  

            My father had been an associate professor at a large Ohio university starting in the early 1960's. A little over 30 years and a full professorship later, he retired  --- and to this day maintains that it wasn't a moment too soon. In his three decades at the university, he watched it decline from a stately institution of higher learning to an over-stimulated welfare state and spawning ground for left-wing political correctness. The latter element was usually enforced by full-blown coercion or worse, among faculty and students alike.    

 

            And speaking of students, beginning in the early 1980's, an eerie metamorphasis began to affect them as well.  According to my father, their collective attitude could be expressed something like this: Behold my work, call it brilliant, and get out of my way.

 

            Mentally, they were sharp as carpet nails when it came to their rights and expectations, but concepts like responsibility and accountability were light years beyond their grasp.  They also displayed an uncanny instinct to gravitate toward like-minded disciples while dismissing the rest of us as second-class citizens --- at best.  Worse yet, as leaders in government they would do the same to anyone who dissents, on the grandest scale since pre-World War II Europe. Or more to the point, Germany.       

 

            Truth be known, I blame the Liberals for a most of what plagues America these days, and may soon finish us altogether. I blame them for the shocking decline in our moral values and the impotence of our children's public schools. I blame them for the virtual ruin of the traditional family unit, what had been a vital part of our country's strength (while we still had it.) And I blame Liberals for the steady erosion of America's identity and sovereignty, in the wake of the far-left's ambition to subject American rights and liberties to the discretion of the United Nations --- an act of unspeakable outrage that President Clinton had nearly completed as one of his last official acts in office. An act that President Bush had thankfully nixed, as one of his first.

 

            Different from most, isn't that what I had said at the outset --- about my blog, I mean? Yes, I believe it was. And the difference is that mine has a boldly conservative agenda, as if you haven't noticed,  and there's nothing "hidden" about it.

 

            In the coming weeks, I'll be laying it on the line, from one hotbed issue to the another, as they come to my attention, or simply come to mind. Once in awhile, I might even side with a Liberal --- though I wouldn't count on it. But one thing you can count on is that whether you love it, or just love to hate it, Cut to the Chase is here to stay!

             

rs


Posted at 03:53 pm by rodsenter
Make a comment